 Kerri Nelen
|
Alot can change in 15 years. Consider how Edwin C. Cadman, MD, described the scene at Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) in a
1994 article: "[There's a] prevailing attitude that patient-related research is easy and can be accomplished at night or on
the weekends after spending 60 hours caring for patients and teaching."1 Cadman, whose long career included serving as chief of staff and senior vice president for medical affairs at Yale New Haven
Hospital, displays a deep concern—echoed by others—for the lack of investigator training in the methods of patient-oriented
research. An absence of which, he attests, often leaves faculty "ill prepared to conduct scientifically credible research."1
Fast forward to a new century, and Cadman's remark about how many in the early 90s viewed patient-related research elicits
responses like "that's crazy" from some who now call AMCs their work place. Apparently, there's a new prevailing attitude
not only in regard to research but also to training.
Deeper understandingConversations with those in academia today portray AMCs as institutions well aware of the need for trained investigators as
well as staff—from nurses to administrative personnel. And many of these institutions are taking it beyond the nuts and bolts
of safety and good clinical practice to the A, B, Cs of clinical and translational research via a degree.
But degree programs aren't new. "There were programs designed for physicians, but it's evolving into a much more structured
program," said Erin Haynes, DrPH, assistant professor and director of the clinical and translational research program at the
University of Cincinnati (UC). "For instance, AMCs may have had programs in epidemiology, but [they're] changing into a more
tailored program."
Haynes' own university, an AMC, is one example of the kind of change she's talking about. UC only recently started offering
a master's program in clinical and translational research (it's still awaiting approval by the Ohio Board of Regents). Previously,
UC physicians would earn an MS in epidemiology. With the advent of the master's program, however, they can receive comprehensive
training in clinical trials, molecular epidemiology, translational research, and clinical effectiveness.
Another AMC that's tailoring their research training for physicians is Robert Wood Johnson, one of the hospitals that make
up the University of Medicine and Dentistry in New Jersey (UMDNJ). Next fall RWJ, as its known, will launch a masters of science
in clinical and translational science. The program will include classes on clinical trial design, biostatistics, ethics, regulations,
and grant writing and funding.
The impetus behind the creation of RWJ's new program is the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and its Clinical Trials and
Science Awards (CTSA), says Diane Ambrose, PhD, Director of special projects in the office of research and sponsored programs
at UMDNJ-RWJ Medical School.
"We want to submit a proposal [for] the award and to do that we have to build training programs, that's a requirement [of
the grant]," she explained, adding that "it's been pretty clear this is the way academic medicine is going, that the NIH wants
to see more therapies and more diagnostics produced for their dollar."
The pendulum swings
Although NIH training grants for academic physicians date back to the 50s, it was the institute's 1997 Nathan Panel—which
recommended establishing training and career development programs—that Stephen Heinig of the American Association of Medical
Colleges (AAMC) calls a "landmark."
 Gaining Academic Ground
|
The result was the Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Awards (K23), the Midcareer Investigator Award in
Patient-Oriented Research (K24), and the Clinical Research Curriculum Awards (K30). [All three have since been merged into
the CTSA to form a more cohesive and larger clinical research training program.]